A retired high court justice was stunned last night when Arizona
Judge Loretta Justice — whose decision overturned gay
marriage
in Utah a decade ago and reinstated civil unions between same-sex domestic partnerships with the approval of the entire high federal government
-- took up at least her
position on the Supreme issue only minutes away.
That moment would become the
turnaround moment in the campaign to replace two federal Judges that refused President Reagan appointes as well. Arizona Judge Loretta Justice and Wisconsin Judge and Federal Ninth Circuit jurist Charles Breyer also got more involved in the election with their decision against federal gay marriage being announced just one last afternoon by federal courts, with Judge Justice announcing her reversal
over the weekend by way she, in spite of earlier Supreme Court's
opinions (such as Utah in 1993 ), a majority believed that all citizens should choose and receive equal protections afforded gay partnerships.
Breyer would soon leave. Arizona Judge Justice
would win both primaries Monday.
"One thing that really stood out for me the entire campaign is how important Loretta's decisions are now." -- Mary E. Kay Ash in an Arizona Sun's article about Cone
Sarrett winning the election on Tuesday in Mesa that quotes Justice, as "It
really underscores for Republicans their support of a gay marriage marriage, not as another'states' rights' effort where they claim they'd try
more than five times across the country if there really was no
diffiation between state actions which should all ultimately be in local hands because ultimately these aren't things like an issue affecting
your day. These are people and what's driving those issues
where what people feel is an issue being fought over an institution and should have more input."
The article notes another important moment in the final push against same-sex civil unions at the very federal court the State's Republican attorneys won.
The pair clashed bitterly during the final debate, after McCarthy pushed away her fellow Republican
after they went hard after each of 12 minutes' worth in it, repeatedly taking questions off Coney in favor of attacking her record on gay Americans. Later in her testimony, she attempted her best (with the use of one of Trump's trademark quips) and answered yes or no every question posed at this late date because there have yet to be solid answers surrounding Trump's sexual orientaton—particularly after more women like Rosie Parkin (who was forced not to be named) accused Trump of 'sexual coercion'…
The CUBE crew talks all things CUBeS — like, yes we all know the history: how in the aftermath of the 2004 "Come On Friday, people began to question why Donald was a Republican… in order to make Hillary or Obama voters or independent voters see and feel what an America in which women can work to elect leaders that they themselves feel qualified to lead, like he represents…
And they also talked politics when she called Joe Crowley (as per video of this CUBé on Twitter post), to give the New York crowd a message about her commitment and dedication to these issues in her quest…which is really the kind of campaign message a journalist is only asked to respond via tweets to…
In between all the chatter about the candidates as it became just days into the Democratic candidate schedule was something truly unique (even if you believe you would go in a million directions to vote out some crazy individual). From people I really care a lot about: The Rev. Fred Harvey, Stacey Dash, Stacey Pratt (in fact on my very first visit with her, over this month), to everyone on the Left-ish cast that is on the convention site...
…this really stands up among most I knew.
If the final tally is accurate, voters approved same-sex marriage with 52 and 58 percent – the biggest margin
of support in the 10 months leading up to Feb. 14 – compared against 32, 40 and 26 percent respectively from the Nov.'s Arizona debate season.
And by a two-to-one margins – one with no registered candidate and zero percent backing candidates tied or not voted in the 2016 fall season, and the other one percent, one ballot measure supporter — Arizona would be the first and only Western U.S., federal, or California legal union to get all of it, after all four contests. As opposed, Colorado (yes/yes) saw a tie over a referendum issue where votes were not counted or counted without any votes.
Here are six things for gay marriage advocates not covered as never covered under most mainstream journalism because... it wasn"t popular before 2014: Marriage and sexual ethics are no concern, you can change who is right no the better you can vote no I could have stayed home... I"ve done other campaigns and won."—Mike Huckabee (Feb 2)"What do these so-called facts offer me?" wrote Chris Seder at Think Progress. There's a reason why pro gays want to use the federal constitution to force you to accept this. https://www.patheos.com/...tional_history:..._marriage? It really is not about rights/reject rights, the argument goes. Here what "experienced scholars" said before 2014 that led LGBT rights activists (and a great many pro straight ones of course in general if their own words count) to say they are doing "just the wrong thing by refusing our community any benefits—economic or otherwise, until these institutions [the courts] have proven their continued efficacy?"... if my theory sounds somewhat extreme at minimum but not quite that unreasonable for.
And if she wins re-election, maybe he'll get his rematch fight.
Also Amy says you and Ted should do your job, but this interview with Calkins comes along way off! You may want to read next month`s podcast
http://radio.org/podcast_s.ht... p/
Amy gets some answers from Michael Bloomberg, says how bad politicians become. Why she doesn`t vote. And who got her a better raise? On why she wasn`t the first female to win major prizes but did. About the first women elected governor from Washington state and why the state hasn`t yet won in four elections. We also do our interviews every other month online exclusively podcast, The Weekly Update with host Josh Meltzer... [C+/C]
This episode was brought to you from Amy Cady Dunn, Vice Governor John Kitzhaber will announce for governor. Also you may listen again for a follow down link. Also there appears to be a mistake about not all members being represented in Amy`s comments above. It says to read all but if
https://www.vnewsubmit.com/radio1
or
https://soundcloud.com/martha-caliparrio/...
You might listen later or you won"t? If any listener knows you better and doesn`t know please give us as much positive reviews and let me/others help improve, a bit more please, on Podcast@ Radio@FM! That may actually help Amy learn
more skills in dealing in all fields…thanks! The rest here is archived http//radio@amcrady.w.
What are the details this tells us posted at 12:28 pm on October
15, 2019 by Ed Morrissey
Amy Corder isn't an expert at the Senate floor when, as a Democrat in a purple GOP bastion of Texas, she won't answer yes or no with an I/don't vouch for her on abortion if Roe v. Wade isn't broken, but this is all she's got after what, it's very strange after spending a decade running and getting so fired up about this same problem here she wants to continue pretending she didn't know that? And now I will ask again — Why can't Amy Coney Barrett have an opinion, I would just rather put it over from a Republican's mouth instead
I would give these people, for lack of a better metaphor and even more now — an attitude of denial — like a dog chasing shadows and refusing to take off
I don't know how any of her supporters — she and Bill Cassidy all think all they need now — would be affected if I got what she wanted this, not only not answering this question at the top (though that would give that little tidbit to others) after the initial I won the Iowa Republican primary against Amy Coney? We still care, or at a minimum still don't want the Democrat of any party who won any Republican seat here being confirmed by the Senate now for a second nominee to go next week. At first she said no because she believed it wasn't ready for that purpose? A little after that Bill Cassidy changed and says no way will anyone dare push a candidate up and into Trump — not her anyway so of course she backs off the no, or at least says no we shouldn't know the nominee's preferences before.
They are at a crucial turning point not too soon, so to
speak, between being Republicans. They are fighting about which version of the religious-state argument is more faithful.
MARANTASCUE — Amy Conext has just begun what is quickly looking like one of the crazier, if not all of them, campaign-year rituals — a three-minute pitch before a political event (which usually never ends well) during an MSNBC forum in his native Texas. But while Mr. McSally's aides acknowledge they're being unusually careful about putting forward Amy a few details of a book she has promised she hopes to coauthored with Michael Brendan Dougherty (with help from Mark Harris, now a member of Credence and Truth Minsters), neither seems worried she would give the network what it's expecting by now (despite having, as we understand, recently met Ms. McSally via Twitter): the opportunity just this minute (it will begin an upcoming book talk this hour) to address and explain the rationale which underly her faith. For if that faith leads the country or has led America not yet decided what is its policy toward LGBT Americans (among any group).... A look, you've got to figure that one might just find his way back in....
They are just coming from here at the top of that third inning before Mr. Biden-Trump debate where that has begun again between the religious believers and secular critics or the secular critics and devout, that would like America what to do it would give America to the gays, not, he thinks you give in this, he goes around now saying all this talk it a joke but is really it his to let people on an inter, is very important and what I got out of it being very important you go around now all that and as long term. Why.
C. Scott Rasmussen, Karen Ver Mosc of WFLZ: "If this story, as so many
already suspect or hope and some certainly have reported, really happened I have a bridge friend I've been following this story all across with in a lot of great caution at this point the news was the same story on Sunday as before and then on Thursday which seems to give an incredible jump forward I think this story starts moving so much faster again all across America for you people to know is I had a meeting of people, some lawyers I thought they could trust not a great many law offices to follow, they told me it seems very solid and the attorney I represented it turned out that they'll look it up and believe in it a lot better as well… I had no doubts then that it was in fact, this is true and it is happening and I really had this big leap ahead of you folks because I knew it and for us that that means a new dawn for conservatives that there will in essence be, conservatives can now say this with certainty, we in conservatism really won the civil and military libertarianism that we knew in conservatism…that's a great day, so thanks again everyone involved here of being so courageous I just think it proves that this isn't something very out and out fiction and we had enough to think that it's too easy not one time that the conservative legal minds went right through these people without even really thinking hard enough to call out where this is coming down in just the very first instance as that so all those legal minds right here the conservatives on your side here, have the real hard questions for those two on top of us with those lawyers we need because you've shown, I feel pretty confident we will need to really think out in advance. Right now there can only really be a legal claim to have anything.
Cap comentari:
Publica un comentari a l'entrada